Sign Up for Mailing List   Contact Us   Advertise    Request Reprints of Articles

NJLawman.com
N E W S,  O P I N I O N,  C O M M E N T A R Y
                                          
 

       L A W   E N F O R C E M E N T   M A G A Z I N E


2014 NJ Police Training & Schools

Visit Us on Facebook

Follow Us on Twitter

Visit
Our
2014
NJ
Police Training
&
Schools Section

 

Features

Home

NJ Law Enforcement

Site Search

Editorials

Roll Call

Opinions

Photo of the Week

Links

Site Map

 

News

Police News

News Archives Nation

News Archives NJ

L/O Duty Deaths

Events

 

Marketplace

LE Equipment

LEO Gifts

 

Click here to receive NJ Law Enforcement Bulletins

 

Training

NJ Police Training

National Training

 

Resources

Invest Resources

NJ Media Center

10 Deadly Sins

NJ Newspapers

Comp Time Law

NJ Most Wanted

Police Videos

Entry Level

Links

Police Poems

National Police Week

 

IA

IA Resource Center

Garrity Warning

 

Forums

Forums

 

NJLawman.com

About Us & Info

Advertise

Contact Us

Contact Us

 

Satellite Phones  An Asset
for Disasters

 

Law Enforcement
&
Police
Grants

 

Stinger Flashlights

What you Need to Know  Before Making a Purchase!

 

PBA Loan

 

Police and Law Enforcement Home  >  Editorials    >    Mandatory Body Armor

NJLawman.com

EDITORIAL

Police and
Law Enforcement News


MANDATORY BODY ARMOR

NJLawman.com
Wednesday, August 4, 2004  12:00 a.m.

In an article covering one of the recent shootings, it was mentioned that one agency is considering enacting a policy where patrol officers would be required to wear body armor.

What is troublesome is that such a policy need be implemented in 2004.

 

They are bulky, uncomfortable, awkward and they leave your t-shirt soaked at the end of the shift. They make some look fat and others hunchback.

But, for Christís sake, they stop bullets!

They also significantly reduce the impact of other weapons and hands to the chest, they frequently stop edged weapons, and in numerous instances, they have protected officersí vital organs in car accidents.

Also, we may be seeing the reemergence of unprovoked attacks on LEOís. Each day in the papers we are reading about gang-related shootings of officers around the country. 

In 2003, 146 officers died nationwide in the line of duty.

Back in the 70ís when anti-law enforcement groups flourished (including the one the took the life of Trooper Werner) the numbers were much higher. Below are the nationwide line of duty deaths from the early 70ís:

1970   216

1972   225

1974   275

1971   240

1973   261

1975   234

Many of these officers who fell didn't have access to the body armor we have today, and many didn't have access to body armor period.

Mandatory vest policies should be in place for all officers who work the road. Detectives, investigators, administrators and those in similar positions can have an amended policy so they are not forced to wear body armor when engaged in non-encounter duties, but some type of rule should cover them too for when they are engaged in crime fighting on the road.

NJLawman.com wholeheartedly endorses agency adopted policies requiring the wearing of body armor for road officers, corrections officers and all other LEOís likely to encounter dangerous persons.

NJLawman.com

 

Reader Comments

August 23, 2004

We buy our vests for our Officers and make it mandatory to wear while in uniform....it is the Officers choice when in plain clothes for administrative duty.  We had an officer shot 14 years ago and he was the only one on duty with a vest, ever since then we have made it our policy to make it mandatory.  He is alive today and although he can't be a Police Officer he works as an administrative tech.

          -DW

          -Tucson, Arizona

 

August 14, 2004

I'm sorry but I don't agree with you. I believe it should be the choice of the officer to wear the vest or not. Of course I believe it should be the choice of the driver if he wants to wear a seatbelt or not also. I believe too much time is wasted in so called seatbelt safety checks. I know the what the law says, but I think that should be left to the road officer to enforce when he makes a stop. I know I got off the subject, but it's all the same. You should make the decision.

          -Anonymous

 

August 10, 2004

I agree!! The NJ State Body Armor Replacement fund is giving out more than 3.4 Million Dollars for new vests. It should be required that if you use state money you MUST wesr the vest!!

I commend NJLawman for encouraging mandatory wearing of bullet resistant vest.

          -Det. James P. Gomez, WLBPD

 

August 5, 2004

With these gangs not caring about officers by going after them and their families. I am wearing my vest every time I wear my uniform no matter how hot it gets outside. I rather be a fried chicken then a dead duck!

          -Anonymous

 

August 5, 2004

Our admin loves to run out of the office when there's a hot call.  They'll grab rifles and shotguns, but not one will take the time to throw on a vest.

          -Anonymous

 

August 5, 2004

Yes, I agree we all should wear the vest that one day might save our live from the people that are trying to take ours just for the fun of it.

          -Anonymous

Visit Our 2013 NJ Police Training & Schools Section

Mailing List

Receive New Jersey Law Enforcement bulletins
If you would like to receive New Jersey law enforcement
bulletins and/or law enforcement job announcements, click here.

Police and Law Enforcement Home    Advertise    Submit Your Site
Submit Police News   Police Grants    Police Forums    Police News

Copyright ©2002-2014-All Rights Reserved  Law Enforcement Media Group - (Not an Official Police Department)    PERC

 

S O C I A L    M E D I A