Minority test takers score lower on the New Jersey Department of
Personnel Sergeant's exam, so the only fathomable explanation is that
the exam is discriminatory. This is the position of our United States
Department of Justice which filed a lawsuit last month making this
In the suit, they want the current exam system thrown out; they want
officers who were "harmed" by the exam promoted; and they want back pay
and retroactive seniority.
The suit came complete with a press release warning all who dare not
meet their standards.
should send a clear message to all public employers that employment
practices with unlawful discriminatory impact on account of race or
national origin will not be tolerated,” said Thomas Perez, Assistant
Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division. “The Justice Department
will take all necessary action to ensure that such discriminatory
practices are eliminated and that the victims of such practices are made
Perhaps we are not as enlightened as those who filed this action, but
shouldn't the determination as to whether the exam is discriminatory be
made by judging the exam itself as opposed to the scores.
For those not familiar with the NJDOP sergeant's exam, it is usually
held every three years in the fall and consists of anywhere from sixty
to one hundred questions. An announcement for the exam comes out
several months prior and includes a list of books from which the
questions will be taken. The areas to be tested are traffic law,
criminal law, case law, New Jersey Attorney General Guidelines,
management and supervision, and other such relevant areas.
So the obvious question is, if the Department of Justice feels that an
exam about subject matter commonly used by New Jersey police sergeants
is not appropriate for screening prospective New Jersey police
sergeants, what exactly would they suggest?
There are reasons for scoring disparity that have nothing to do with
College graduates have an advantage as most have the organizational
skills and academic discipline needed to prepare for an exam covering
such a vast amount of information. Historically, there have been and
still are large differences between the races in obtaining college
Then, there is the issue of recruiting. In an effort to expand
diversity many agencies have conducted aggressive recruiting campaigns
in neighborhoods and cities known for having challenged school systems.
It's logical that officers from these areas would have a more difficult
time with the exam.
How about native language, family income, early family life, one vs.
two-parent households, and cultural environments? These all play a
role, and they have nothing to do with the test.
And what about the Pandora's box opened by this lawsuit? There have
been studies showing that Asian students score better on standardized
testing that all other races. If this trend carried over to the
promotional exam, do whites have cause for action? Where does it end?
The current testing system is not perfect. Every department has that
highly skilled street cop with great job knowledge and natural
leadership instincts who just has a hard time with a written test. But
at least prospective sergeants are tested on material relevant to the
position. More importantly, the questions mostly come from a book list
provided well in advance of the exam. We can't ask for much more.
As of now, the exam has been basically frozen. The results from the
most recent test given last fall have not been released and are said to
be on hold until the legal situation is settled. That could be years.
The affects of this nonsensical lawsuit will be massive. It will
undoubtedly cause huge problems within departments around the state.
The patience of the thousands of officers who put their lives on hold
and spent a small fortune preparing for the test will slowly erode, and
counter actions will likely follow.
The Department of Justice could have gone many ways here but chose the
easiest route: the discrimination card. Maybe it will garnish the most
headlines, but it certainly will not do anything to improve screening
for police sergeants. In the end, promoting the most knowledgeable,
most qualified, and most capable person for the job has to be the only
priority. We can't afford to be promoting or skipping anybody based on
race, gender, religion, or status. We're talking about the future
leadership of law enforcement.
No one wants an exam that discriminates against any group, and there
doesn't appear to be any evidence that this is the case here. It's
unfortunate that the Department of Justice is so quick to label an exam
discriminatory from a single statistic without exploring further
possibilities. It's unfortunate, and it's lazy.
And shame on you Civil Service Commission (formerly New Jersey
Department of Personnel) for acquiescing to this garbage. Issue the
test results from the most recent exam, and allow departments to
continue on course.
This grandstanding by the Department of Justice needs to be fought.
Hopefully, New Jersey law enforcement interest groups and unions are
preparing for battle.
What do you think? Use the scroll box below to leave your comment.
your Thoughts on This
While all opinions will be considered, we will not post any messages
that are inflammatory, that bash any ethnic group, or that are just
beyond reason. Letters will be reviewed and posted each day.
NJLawman.com reserves the right to alter, shorten, or decline any
NOT WRITE IN ALL CAPITALS! Please.
This is very typical of the Obama administration's Justice Department.
The US Constitution is being turned on its' head. Obama does not care
about merit or hard work or intelligence. Obama wants equality across
the board irrespective of deservedness or worthiness. In other words,
if you are a minority, Obama will get you that promotion despite the
fact that you may not have studied one day for the test and he will use
the DOJ and alleged "discriminatory practices" to undermine those who
put the time in to study hard and get promoted. Its a damned shame.
Hey, I have an idea. While we are at it...let's tell all the college
kids who are busting their asses for that A+ grade in school that they
must accept a B so that we can give the dumb ass lazy jack ass with a D
a B as well ...this way everybody is equal. Hey, spread the wealth
right? Doesn't matter how hard you work right? The idiot Obama fans are
riding the coattails of those of us who earn our keep. Good luck folks
and stay safe. This country is going down fast!
To the person who commented that this lawsuit represents reverse
discrimination; let me advise you that there is no such entity as
reverse discrimination. Webster did not assign race to the definition in
his dictionary. DISCRIMINATION IS DISCRIMINATION. This lawsuit will help
cloud the real discriminatory issues that may exist in any department.
As I have read in many responding posts, I find it an insult to suggest
a minority member can NOT score high enough on a test to receive a
promotion. As a minority male, I wish my agency had a D.O.P. promotional
test, just not the same wretched filth it called a test several years
I am a Hispanic female. I have taken the same promotional exam as my
peers, studied the same material, and was promoted at each rank. I am
currently #1 on the captain's list, and if not for the current financial
crisis, would already be promoted. To say that the test is
discriminatory against minorities is to say that we are not capable of
doing the same work as our peers. I resent the notion. I am equally
capable and do not want special or differential treatment. I will take
the same test as everyone else, thank you very much.
That lawsuit is an insult to my intelligence. As an 8 year veteran
Hispanic officer in the state of New Jersey, I have watched many
minority officers work hard to accomplish their goals and climb up the
chain of command. Those officers spent their money and valuable time to
achieve their goals. I never heard one of them complain about any of the
tests they took. It’s an insult to me and those before me. For those
complaining and filling lawsuits, I have three words “mind over matter”
if it’s not in your mind to do it, it doesn’t matter” and if it doesn’t
matter enough to put time and effort, quit complaining and get another
The test should include several phases. The first being the written
portion produced by the DOP. The second should be a DOP approved test
that covers your knowledge of your community, local ordinances and
department rules & regulations. The third part could be an oral
interview and/or personnel file review. Departments could use DOP or
Chiefs of Police to conduct the oral and personnel file review.
So does that mean they have to use the list that just expired? I sure
the guys on the old list are hoping for that to happen.
It is an awful shame the race card was thrown out. Who ever made the
complaint is an absolute fool! I guess, reading, writing and basic
understanding do not apply in our lives as police officers. Give me
Now, we have to wait for this frivolous complaint to come to head,
before we get our test results back!!! What a waste and abuse of legal
paper! Shame on you DOJ!
Signed: A Hispanic Police Officer who can read, write and has basic
understanding. Oh yeah, and who received hugs from mommy and daddy as a
Paid a lot of good money for a prep course and studied real hard.. Even
left the hospital after my son was born to attend class. Disappointing
I'm White and not very bright, but I worked hard and tried my best.
Blacks and Hispanics have been beating me in school my whole life, in
sports as well based on just natural talent. I have always worked twice
as hard as everyone else to get where I am. This is going to set back
race relations in most police departments back 25 years, good job CSC
and the DOJ. I guess its the traffic detail for me for the next 10
What a joke!!! I work in a department with predominately white male
officers. 33% of our Captains are Hispanic. 25% of the Lieutenants are
minority. 60% of our ranking officers are African-American. We are a
Civil Service Department. The questions on the test are the same for
everyone!!!!!!! The test discriminates against those who do not want to
I do not agree that college graduates have an edge. The people that come
out on top in my opinion are the one's who put the time in and study.
Elizabeth is arguably the most competitive municipality in Elizabeth.
Last cycle we participated in was fall of 2007 and Elizabeth had the
highest state wide score for Captain, Lieutenant and Sergeant. I have
scored 1 for sergeant, 3 for lieutenant and 2 for captain and I have a
GED and 60 college credits, no degree. The answer to doing well is
study, study and study. Each time I gave up 6 months of my life and
studied at least 30-40 hours a week. There is no secret to doing well
hard work and dedication.
This lawsuit is based on the flawed concept of disparate impact, or
"unintentional discrimination." Basically, any test or other selection
procedure that results in a statistical imbalance can be labeled as
Even more obnoxious is the so-called guideline that four Federal
enforcement agencies use to determine if such an impact is present.
Known as the 80 percent rule, the government believes that if the
passing rates of the lowest groups are less than 80 percent of the
passing rate for the highest group, they will "generally" find evidence
of an adverse impact.
In this matter, Hispanics passed at a rate of 87% compared to whites;
blacks passed at a rate of 82%. Neither fall below the standard that the
government who filed this suit utilizes. This lawsuit is frivolous and
will only erect barriers between personnel. It must be challenged.
I don't think the Unions can do much on this but those who have taken
the test and passed and now face a delay or no promotion at all should
file a class action law suit on the DOJ.
Sounds like pure reverse discrimination! Where and when will it stop!
America loses when the best person for the job doesn't get it because of
the color of their skin! Spineless politics!!
In my years as a police officer, I've taken this test three times. I
did obtain the referenced material and read some of it. My placement on
two of the tests I was happy with. The last test, I'm still waiting on
the results. Regardless of the results, the key words for me are that I
didn't really read ALL of the required material and this last test, if
you didn't read the common sense book, then you had problems. I don't
blame anyone else, BUT myself for my test results. I knew of the test
materials, bought them, and just winged the test.
Who I really feel sorry for are those poor bro's that took the Holtz or
Bernstein courses for the latest test and now its held up. That really
blows considering the price tag attached to it.
Good luck to all. BTW, I am a minority, Puerto Rican to be exact.
This lawsuit is a slap in the face to everyone of my minority brothers
and sisters who take a promotional, don't pass it and say to themselves,
I've got to do better next time. If the person who filed this is a law
enforcement officer, they need to find another job. They're not part of
I imagine this also freeze the Lt. test since its the same. Maybe
instead of the race card the DOJ should hold departments to training
standards. From what I see very few get what they need. Now with budget
cuts I'll be lucky to get an in-service class.
As a minority police officer, I am embarrassed by this lawsuit. I do not
want a dumbed down test just because I am Hispanic. If you cant pass a
standard job related exam then that's your own fault. All this lawsuit
does is give the rest of us minorities a bad name. Thank you morons!
The 2002 NJDOP Sergeant's test used as one of the listed textbooks
titled "Multicultural Law Enforcement" (by Shusta, et al). This book
broke down several of the larger "minority" subgroups (African American,
Asian American, Latino American, Native American, and Muslim American).
The text explained the cultural differences of each group in a way to
better assist law enforcement officers in dealing with, having an
understanding of, and preventing actions that could be found offensive
by a member of that particular group.
So, any minority that took that particular year's test, would have had a
natural advantage; having personal knowledge of the cultural aspects of
his/her respective minority group. So that candidate would know the
answer better than someone who simply read the textbook.
Where were the lawyers from DOJ and other places crying foul over this;
for if you apply the ridiculous reasoning in this latest lawsuit to the
situation in 2002, then white males and females would have been
disparaged, not provided due process, and should have had their scores
adjusted. Furthermore, all white males and females who didn't get
promoted off the 2002 through 2005 list should be awarded promotions,
back pay, and damages. Where was the DOJ and the lawyers then??? Oh, of
course, NOBODY complained. We simply read the book, studied and took
I know with a Presidential Administration such as the current debacle,
it is hard to ask for people to hold themselves accountable and simply
say, I didn't do as well as I could, period. But, especially now, since
the DOJ really hasn't handled any "crisis" since the Rodney King days of
1991; the DOJ will lend the sympathetic ear to these BASELESS claims.
People, it's pretty simple-you are informed of the written material that
will be the subject of the test, you are afforded months of study time,
all have the open capability to sign up for one of the many study groups
to increase your chances of success. If you choose not to study, or if
you have been the subject of negative disciplinary penalties (which
affect your score), then stand up and say "I could have done better-I
FAILED MYSELF) and try again next time, period.
I shudder, cringe, and almost want to vomit at what this country is
fostering-a socialist society of enablers. Because I worked really
hard, kept my nose clean, and got promoted; now I have to share that
award (or give it away to) with another person who doesn't deserve it.
It's Obama and Company's Socialism 101-now part of the NJ Dept. of
Personnel/Civil Service Commission.
-21 year veteran
Is anyone counter suing the DOJ or seeking any type of court order to
compel the CSC to release the scores? is this on anyone's mind? Can
the state FOP or PBA fund legal payment and initiate this?
Working as a Law Enforcement Officer in the State of New Jersey is
difficult enough as it is. We have more restrictions and sanctions
restricting our actions than any other state. The current Sergeant’s
exam is directly related to our job functions and serves as a measure to
ensure that those tasked with supervising police personnel have a
somewhat comprehensive knowledge of the laws of this state. It has
absolutely nothing to do with race whatsoever. If you apply yourself
and take the initiative to study and learn what is necessary, you will
perform well on the test. To promote less qualified individuals that
may not have demonstrated the necessary proficiencies will put the
state, the municipality, and the people they protect in danger. The
test is not racially biased, however, the content of this lawsuit is
racially biased. Caucasian males appear to be the ONLY group that
cannot be discriminated against according to our government. It needs
I'll have to agree with a few of you, it's difficult to claim that a
test is discriminatory when you are provided with the same study
material and prep courses every one else has. In my opinion I would
have to say that discrimination in NJ LE is more confined to the simple
entry level position that many people seek. Lets be honest here, how
many small police department do we have here in NJ that include fathers,
sons, uncles, brothers, and cousins. True discrimination in NJ LE is not
limited to just race but also connections.
In order to limit this practice smaller departments should be
consolidated to become larger departments and testing should be
mandatory. When you Test it's hard to justify why you hired the guy who
scored a 70 over the guy who scored a 90. One thing many people don't
understand is that if your a minority police officer the minority
community makes you an outcast, and your great brothers in blue distrust
you because you don't have the same last name as they do or have a
darker tan. It doesn't feel great when your outside looking in and and
the only thing you want is to do your best. There really are a lot of
departments here in NJ who don't even test people for promotions. You
just come in to work and there's a wonderful gold badge in your mail
If your lucky and get OTJ then you might as well sell your soul to your
commanders if you have any hope of moving up the chain.
But that's my opinion and maybe I'm just cranky because my snow blower
broke in the middle of this blizzard.
First of all the sergeant exam is not discriminatory and this is coming
from a minority male. Second, the one post about years of
discrimination is correct but it happen like you said "45 years ago" so
we as a people can not continue to bring up the past. Third, some
departments don't even have a testing policy and just hand out
promotions to their friends and family, so the testing process might not
be perfect but it at least gives you an opportunity. For the comment
about scholarships for just blacks and affirmative action you can
complain about that as well if you like but without that minorities of
all races would continue to be overlooked on the basis of ethnicity.
Affirmative action is not perfect but like a testing process it gives at
least some form of equal opportunity to everyone. This problem doesn't
just affect whites it affects everyone we all supposedly bleed blue.
This profession does not see color and as a law enforcement officer I
ask that all my fellow brother officers stand together and dispute this
claim of racial discrimination in regards to the sergeants exam. The
only thing that all these posts will do is cause dissention within the
law enforcement community. In closing in order to score well on these
tests is to study, take the prep classes, and get a good night sleep.
All the tests are based on JOB KNOWLEDGE and reading books that are
given months in advance. This state is fast becoming a bigger joke than
it already is. I know, lets just promote all minorities or give them 15
extra points for putting their name on the test correctly. What a
joke! I have spoken to several officers at my dept. who happen to be
minorities and they are ashamed of this law suit and have said to a man
that the test is job related. again what a joke.
All of the years I attended school I remained distracted and could not
concentrate on my work because I couldn't stop thinking about my peoples
former oppression, this is why I score lower on the test. What a bunch
of crap. I would be embarrassed to be handed a rank. Sort of sounds like
welfare for LE!
I don't understand how something is "discriminatory" when everyone can
get the same study material. Look you are either going to do good on
the test or your not. It doesn't matter your race or sex. I have
stated before I am not a very good test taker. It took me three tries
to get a really good score on the DOP Civil Service Test. Why should
anyone who did well on the Sgt. exam be punished because I am sure there
are minorities that did well and have a decent ranking. So for the US
DOJ maybe you should worry about getting funding to police departments
that can't afford new equipment or hire new officers that should be your
concern, and not about a test that everyone is able to study for.
Caucasian males dominate law enforcement in this state and elsewhere.
Why? Because Caucasians males have had over a 100 year head start in
getting there families rooted in the communities, with good jobs and
being able to afford to live anywhere they want because of the ''JIM
CROW'' laws which only ended in 1965. You telling me this hasn't help
Caucasian get a foot hold in Law Enforcement over the years, decades and
hire who only looks like them regardless if the minority individual was
better qualified than his/her white counterpart?
This still happens today believe it or not. So all of you Caucasian
males who are whining over affirmative action need to get over it. If
the playing field wasn't tainted years ago there would be no need for
affirmative action in Law Enforcement.
This is 2010 and there are still PD's in this state that have no
minorities and would like to keep it that way. I know I work right next
to one and their little 15 man department loves it. They wont say it
openly but its been discussed behind closed doors. One of my good
friends who is Caucasian works there and basically told me they don't
want any Minorities working there and would rather keep it that way. So
Caucasian males suck it up and deal with it. If you feel you have been
discriminated against its your right to file a lawsuit, don't sit back
whine and do nothing.
Wow what fantasy world do you live in bud.
White males have it one million times worse then anyone. As anyone
who's getting hired these days... it sure isn't the white male. Oh
and whites are still so racist. The last time I heard anyone say
anything about a black person was years ago but blacks seem to run
there mouths about white Leo's non stop like right now. This state
needs a reality check. The Sgt exam too hard because they don't have
proper schooling because only whites can afford college. How about
all those scholarships for blacks only. And the one guy who tried to
make a whites only scholarship... guess what he was sued for
discrimination. get off your gosh darn high horse. Everyone is equal
but not these days with the NAACP and people within the DOJ thinking
a test could be discriminatory.....Get a Life
This is ridiculous that you claim the 15 man
department likes the fact that there are no minorities working
there. If your so sure just post your friends name and the
department. You won't because you like being a mystery man who
stirs up crap. I am Caucasian and I studied for the Sgt's exam. I
came out in the nineties amongst my colleagues. I guess being
Caucasian didn't help me out. Claiming you can't pass the test due
to race is a cop out. You can sit there and study as much or as
little as you want. Fact of the matter is you need to put the work
in. That's right, hard work pays off. I don't think they should be
handing out Sgt, Lt, or Capt. ranks to anybody who is not
So should the Caucasian male start sounding the alarm for
discrimination. Since they/we are not African American, female or
Hispanic, they/we should automatically be disqualified from the process.
This is getting worse and worse every year. I think the Caucasian
American whom is now the one being discriminated against should stand up
for themselves, or would that be discrimination too.